<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Arbitrage Betting &#8211; Programmatically finding arbitrage bets	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.woodylabs.com/2010/08/arbitrage-betting-programmatically-finding-arbitrage-bets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.woodylabs.com/2010/08/arbitrage-betting-programmatically-finding-arbitrage-bets/</link>
	<description>An exploration of life, technology and writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:21:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Forget Inertia &#8211; A new era. &#124; Woody Hayday &#124; Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.woodylabs.com/2010/08/arbitrage-betting-programmatically-finding-arbitrage-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forget Inertia &#8211; A new era. &#124; Woody Hayday &#124; Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodylabs.com/?p=370#comment-842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] would only use it over php for few of my future web projects.) RAD in C# let me experiment with an arbitrage betting program and write a quick Reddit wallpaper grabber (yes I know it needs fixing); as well as a bunch of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] would only use it over php for few of my future web projects.) RAD in C# let me experiment with an arbitrage betting program and write a quick Reddit wallpaper grabber (yes I know it needs fixing); as well as a bunch of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Woody		</title>
		<link>https://blog.woodylabs.com/2010/08/arbitrage-betting-programmatically-finding-arbitrage-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodylabs.com/?p=370#comment-787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah in essence the differences between bookies both make the % of difference and risk it, by offering different odds with different provisos. In the end I guess its better to spend your time on real, big, positive projects, rather than trying to find holes in well established systems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah in essence the differences between bookies both make the % of difference and risk it, by offering different odds with different provisos. In the end I guess its better to spend your time on real, big, positive projects, rather than trying to find holes in well established systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin		</title>
		<link>https://blog.woodylabs.com/2010/08/arbitrage-betting-programmatically-finding-arbitrage-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 07:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodylabs.com/?p=370#comment-784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In fact, there is a problem especially with tennis. In tennis, it is quite common that one of the opponents retires due to an injury. Many bookmakers have different rules: some of them make both stakes void in this case, in some of them the player who had withdrawn is considered as the loser if at least one ball was played; some of them evaluate the stake non-void only if some number of sets have been already played. 
So in short, you can lose all your money if you bet on both sides and the match is retired. Moreover, the odds between bookmakers with different rules usually differ a little, so when you find an arbitrage, it&#039;s quite probable that the bookmakers you found have different rules.
Sports like football and ice-hockey are less prone to this problem, I think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, there is a problem especially with tennis. In tennis, it is quite common that one of the opponents retires due to an injury. Many bookmakers have different rules: some of them make both stakes void in this case, in some of them the player who had withdrawn is considered as the loser if at least one ball was played; some of them evaluate the stake non-void only if some number of sets have been already played.<br />
So in short, you can lose all your money if you bet on both sides and the match is retired. Moreover, the odds between bookmakers with different rules usually differ a little, so when you find an arbitrage, it&#8217;s quite probable that the bookmakers you found have different rules.<br />
Sports like football and ice-hockey are less prone to this problem, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
